CMI 704 Assignment Example will explore the Multidimensional process of developing organisational strategy, drawing upon contemporary theories and practical applications relevant to Level 7 strategic leadership. The focus will be on critiquing the factors that drive strategy development, appraising various strategic approaches, and discussing the inherent challenges in leading and implementing strategic change within complex organisational environments. The insights gained will culminate in the development of a robust organisational strategy designed to achieve a specific business objective, alongside a comprehensive implementation and monitoring plan.

Learning Outcome 1: Understand how to develop strategy

1.1 Critique the factors which drive the development of organisational strategy

The development of organisational strategy is a dynamic and intricate process, profoundly influenced by a confluence of internal and external factors that necessitate continuous adaptation and foresight. Strategic leaders must possess a nuanced understanding of these drivers to formulate strategies that are not only relevant but also resilient in an ever-evolving global landscape.

Internally, an organisation’s existing capabilities, resources, and culture form the bedrock upon which strategy is built. For instance, the distinctive competencies and core capabilities of a firm, as highlighted by the Resource-Based View (RBV) of strategy, significantly dictate its strategic choices (Barney and Hesterly, 2019).

A robust organisational culture, characterised by innovation and adaptability, can act as a powerful enabler of strategic change, whereas a rigid or risk-averse culture can impede even the most well-conceived plans (Schein, 1993). The availability and allocation of financial, human, and technological resources also critically shape strategic feasibility, determining the scope and ambition of any strategic initiative. Furthermore, the internal political landscape, including the influence of various stakeholders and power dynamics, can either facilitate or obstruct strategic consensus and implementation.

Externally, the macro-environmental forces exert considerable pressure on strategic formulation. The PESTLE (Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, Environmental) framework provides a comprehensive lens through which to analyse these external drivers (Johnson, Scholes, and Whittington, 2008).

Political stability, government policies, and regulatory frameworks directly impact an organisation’s operating environment and strategic options. Economic conditions, such as inflation, interest rates, and consumer spending patterns, influence market demand and resource availability. Sociocultural trends, including demographic shifts, changing consumer preferences, and evolving societal values, necessitate strategic responses to remain relevant and competitive.

Technological advancements, particularly the rapid pace of digital transformation and the emergence of artificial intelligence, present both unprecedented opportunities for innovation and significant threats of disruption (GOV.UK, 2022). Legal and regulatory requirements, encompassing areas like data protection and environmental standards, impose constraints and dictate compliance strategies.

Finally, environmental concerns, such as climate change and resource scarcity, increasingly demand sustainable strategic practices and corporate social responsibility. Beyond these macro forces, the competitive landscape, including the actions of rivals, the bargaining power of buyers and suppliers, and the threat of new entrants or substitute products, as articulated by Porter’s Five Forces, critically shapes an organisation’s competitive strategy (Porter, 2008). The interplay of these internal and external factors creates a complex adaptive system within which strategic development unfolds, requiring leaders to adopt a holistic and systemic perspective rather than a reductionist one (Kaufmann et al., 2000).

1.2 Critically appraise approaches for the development of strategy

The landscape of strategic development is rich with diverse approaches, each offering distinct advantages and limitations depending on the organisational context and the nature of the strategic challenge. A critical appraisal reveals that while some approaches offer structured, rational pathways, others embrace emergent and adaptive processes, reflecting the inherent complexities of modern business environments. One prominent distinction lies between deliberate and emergent strategies (Mintzberg, 1994).

Deliberate strategy, often associated with the planning school of thought, involves a systematic, top-down process where objectives are clearly defined, and detailed plans are formulated in advance. This approach is characterised by formal analysis, extensive data gathering, and a rational decision-making process, often resulting in a comprehensive strategic document. Its strengths lie in providing clarity, direction, and control, particularly in stable environments or for large-scale, resource-intensive projects. However, a critical limitation is its potential rigidity and inability to adapt quickly to unforeseen changes in dynamic markets, leading to a disconnect between the intended strategy and the realised strategy.

Conversely, emergent strategy acknowledges that strategy often materialises from a pattern of decisions and actions taken in response to unfolding circumstances, rather than from a pre-conceived plan. This approach is more adaptive, flexible, and often bottom-up, allowing organisations to learn and adjust their direction as they navigate complex environments.

While it fosters innovation and responsiveness, a potential drawback is the risk of lacking clear direction, leading to fragmented efforts or a reactive rather than proactive stance. A hybrid approach, integrating elements of both deliberate and emergent strategies, is often advocated, where a broad strategic direction is set, but the specific pathways to achieve it are allowed to emerge and adapt (Johnson, Scholes, and Whittington, 2008). This ‘planned emergence’ allows for both strategic coherence and operational flexibility.

Another critical approach is the Resource-Based View (RBV), which posits that an organisation’s sustainable competitive advantage stems from its unique internal resources and capabilities that are valuable, rare, inimitable, and non-substitutable (VRIN) (Barney and Hesterly, 2019). Strategic development from an RBV perspective involves identifying, nurturing, and leveraging these distinctive assets to create superior value.

While the RBV offers a powerful framework for understanding the sources of competitive advantage, a common critique is its potential to be internally focused, sometimes neglecting the external market dynamics and customer needs. Furthermore, identifying truly VRIN resources can be challenging, and the framework offers limited guidance on how to develop or acquire such resources.

Scenario planning represents a forward-looking approach that acknowledges the inherent uncertainty of the future. Instead of predicting a single future, it involves developing multiple plausible future scenarios and formulating strategies that are robust across these different possibilities (Schwartz, 1991).

This approach enhances organisational resilience and adaptability by encouraging leaders to think critically about potential disruptions and opportunities. However, it can be resource-intensive and requires a high degree of imagination and analytical skill. Its effectiveness is also contingent on the quality of the scenarios developed and the organisation’s willingness to act on the insights generated.

Finally, business modelling, particularly the use of tools like the Business Model Canvas, provides a structured approach to designing, testing, and iterating strategic ideas (Osterwalder and Pigneur, 2010). This approach focuses on how an organisation creates, delivers, and captures value, encompassing key partners, activities, resources, value propositions, customer relationships, channels, customer segments, cost structure, and revenue streams.

It fosters a holistic understanding of the business and facilitates rapid prototyping of strategic alternatives. While highly practical and visually intuitive, its primary focus on the business model itself might sometimes overshadow broader strategic considerations such such as industry analysis or macro-environmental shifts. A critical appraisal of these approaches underscores the necessity for strategic leaders to adopt a pragmatic and eclectic mindset, selecting and combining frameworks that best suit their specific context and strategic objectives.

1.3 Discuss the challenges of developing and leading organisational strategy

The development and leadership of organisational strategy are fraught with challenges, particularly in today’s volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (VUCA) world. These challenges extend beyond mere technical difficulties, encompassing profound human, cultural, and systemic complexities that demand sophisticated leadership capabilities.

One significant challenge lies in achieving strategic alignment across diverse organisational functions and hierarchical levels. In large, complex organisations, different departments often operate with their own objectives and priorities, leading to potential conflicts and a lack of synergy in strategic execution. Leaders must effectively communicate the overarching strategic vision and ensure that departmental strategies are coherent and mutually reinforcing, a task that requires exceptional communication and negotiation skills (CMI, 2024).

Another critical challenge is managing cultural resistance to change. Even the most logically sound strategies can falter if they clash with deeply ingrained organisational norms, values, and beliefs. Employees may resist change due to fear of the unknown, loss of status, or a perceived threat to their professional autonomy.

Leaders must therefore act as cultural architects, engaging in extensive stakeholder management, fostering psychological safety, and demonstrating the tangible benefits of the new strategy to overcome inertia and build commitment (Edmondson, 1999). This often involves a delicate balance between driving change and respecting existing organisational identity.

The dynamic nature of external environments presents a perpetual challenge. Rapid technological advancements, shifting market demands, geopolitical instability, and unforeseen black swan events can quickly render existing strategies obsolete. Leaders must cultivate strategic agility and organisational resilience, enabling their organisations to anticipate, respond to, and even capitalise on disruptive changes (Raoofian, 2025). This requires continuous environmental scanning, scenario planning, and a willingness to pivot strategic direction when necessary, moving away from rigid, long-term plans towards more adaptive, iterative approaches.

Resource allocation poses another substantial hurdle. Strategic initiatives often require significant investments of financial, human, and technological capital. Leaders face the difficult task of prioritising competing demands, making tough trade-offs, and securing the necessary resources while maintaining operational efficiency. This is particularly challenging in resource-constrained environments or when existing resources are heavily committed to ‘business as usual’ activities. The ‘double running’ problem, where organisations must simultaneously manage current operations and invest in future strategic capabilities, exacerbates this challenge.

Finally, the ethical and governance dimensions of strategy development are increasingly prominent. Strategic decisions can have far-reaching impacts on employees, customers, communities, and the environment. Leaders must navigate complex ethical dilemmas, ensuring that strategic choices are not only economically viable but also socially responsible and legally compliant.

This includes issues such as data privacy, fair labour practices, environmental sustainability, and corporate governance. A failure in ethical leadership or governance can lead to severe reputational damage, legal penalties, and a loss of stakeholder trust, ultimately undermining the legitimacy and long-term viability of the strategy (CMI, 2024). Addressing these challenges requires strategic leaders to be not only visionary and decisive but also empathetic, ethical, and adept at navigating complexity and ambiguity.

Learning Outcome 2: Know how to develop strategy

2.1 Develop an organisational strategy to achieve a business objective

To illustrate the practical application of strategic development, this section outlines an organisational strategy for a hypothetical medium-sized technology firm, ‘InnovateTech Solutions,’ aiming to achieve the business objective of increasing market share in the Artificial Intelligence (AI) powered analytics software sector by 15% within the next three years.

This objective is SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) and aligns with InnovateTech’s core competencies in software development and data science. The strategy will leverage a combination of market penetration, product development, and strategic partnership approaches, underpinned by a strong focus on customer value and technological innovation. The organisational strategy for InnovateTech Solutions is underpinned by three interconnected strategic pillars.

The first pillar focuses on Enhanced Product Innovation and Differentiation. InnovateTech will commit significant investment to research and development (R&D) to continuously enhance its existing AI analytics platform.

This enhancement will concentrate on developing proprietary algorithms that offer superior predictive modelling capabilities and real-time data processing, providing a distinct competitive edge. To achieve this, the data science team will be expanded by 20%, and a substantial 15% of annual revenue will be allocated to R&D. The overarching goal is to differentiate the platform through superior accuracy, intuitive user-friendliness, and highly specific industry customisation, with a particular emphasis on the demanding healthcare and financial services sectors.

This strategic direction aligns directly with a product development strategy, as articulated by Ansoff (1957), which seeks to introduce new features and improved performance to both existing and new markets, thereby capturing greater value and meeting evolving customer needs.

The second strategic pillar is Targeted Market Penetration and Customer Acquisition. This involves an aggressive strategy to increase market share within InnovateTech’s existing geographical markets, specifically the UK and Western Europe. The focus will be on identifying and targeting underserved segments within the healthcare and financial services industries, where the advanced AI analytics platform can address critical pain points.

To support this, the sales and marketing budget will see a 25% increase, with a concentrated emphasis on sophisticated digital marketing campaigns, tailored industry-specific webinars, and direct sales efforts that highlight the unique value proposition. A key initiative under this pillar will be the development of a ‘freemium’ model for a basic version of the analytics platform.

This model is strategically designed to attract a wider base of new users, allowing them to experience the platform’s benefits firsthand, with the ultimate aim of converting them into paying customers for the full suite of services. This approach embodies a classic market penetration strategy, as defined by Ansoff (1957), which seeks to grow sales of existing products within existing markets by intensifying marketing efforts and competitive pricing.

The third strategic pillar involves Strategic Partnerships and Ecosystem Expansion. InnovateTech will proactively seek and cultivate strategic alliances with leading cloud service providers, such as AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. These partnerships are crucial to ensure the seamless integration and robust scalability of its platform, addressing the infrastructure demands of a rapidly expanding client base.

Furthermore, collaborations with industry-specific data providers and specialised consulting firms will be pursued. These partnerships will serve to enhance the platform’s data enrichment capabilities, providing deeper insights and more comprehensive analytics, and simultaneously extend InnovateTech’s reach into new client bases and market segments.

These collaborations will be formalised through mutually beneficial agreements, with a strong focus on co-development initiatives and joint marketing efforts. This strategic pillar is designed to expand the company’s ecosystem, effectively leveraging external capabilities and expertise to accelerate market access, foster innovation, and solidify its position as a leader in the AI-powered analytics software sector.

Key Success Factors and Metrics:

The success of InnovateTech’s strategy will be rigorously measured against several key performance indicators (KPIs) and critical success factors.

Firstly, Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) will be a primary metric, with an ambitious target to reduce CAC by 10% annually. This reduction will be achieved through continuous optimisation of marketing and sales funnels, ensuring that customer acquisition efforts are not only effective but also highly efficient.

Secondly, Customer Lifetime Value (CLTV) is targeted to increase by 15%, reflecting the enhanced value proposition of the platform and superior customer support, which will foster long-term customer relationships and repeat business.

Thirdly, the Product Feature Adoption Rate for new AI features is set at 70% within six months of launch, indicating the market’s receptiveness to innovation and the platform’s ability to deliver tangible benefits.

Fourthly, Partnership Revenue Contribution is expected to generate 20% of new revenue from strategic partnerships within two years, underscoring the importance of ecosystem expansion and collaborative growth.

Finally, Employee Skill Development is a critical internal success factor, with a goal to ensure that 90% of technical staff complete advanced AI and data science training within 18 months, thereby maintaining InnovateTech’s competitive edge through a highly skilled workforce. These metrics collectively provide a balanced view of strategic performance, encompassing financial, customer, internal process, and learning and growth perspectives.

This strategy is designed to be agile, with quarterly reviews and adjustments based on market feedback and performance metrics. It acknowledges the competitive nature of the AI analytics sector and positions InnovateTech Solutions for sustainable growth and market leadership.

2.2 Recommend an approach to implement and monitor the strategy to ensure its success

The successful implementation and monitoring of InnovateTech Solutions’ strategy to increase market share in the AI-powered analytics software sector requires a systematic and adaptive approach. This involves a clear framework for execution, robust governance, effective communication, and continuous performance measurement. The recommended approach integrates elements of project management, change management, and performance management to ensure strategic objectives are met efficiently and effectively.

Implementation Approach: A Hybrid Model

A hybrid implementation model, combining elements of top-down strategic direction with agile, bottom-up execution, is recommended. The overall strategic direction and key performance indicators (KPIs) will be set by the senior leadership team, ensuring alignment with the overarching business objective. However, the execution of specific initiatives within each strategic pillar will adopt an agile methodology.

This involves breaking down large initiatives into smaller, manageable sprints, allowing for iterative development, rapid feedback loops, and continuous adaptation to market changes. Cross-functional teams, comprising members from R&D, sales, marketing, and customer support, will be formed to drive these sprints, fostering collaboration and shared ownership. Regular stand-up meetings, sprint reviews, and retrospectives will ensure transparency, accountability, and continuous learning throughout the implementation process.

Governance and Leadership:

Effective governance is crucial for steering the strategy towards success. A dedicated Strategy Implementation Committee, comprising senior leaders from all key departments, will be established. This committee will meet monthly to review progress against KPIs, address roadblocks, allocate resources, and make necessary strategic adjustments.

The CEO will chair this committee, underscoring the strategic importance of the initiative. Each strategic pillar will have a designated pillar lead responsible for overseeing its execution and reporting progress to the committee. Leadership will adopt a transformational style, inspiring and motivating teams, fostering a culture of innovation, and empowering employees to take ownership of their contributions to the strategic goals (Bass and Riggio, 2006).

Communication Strategy:

A comprehensive and multi-directional communication strategy is vital to ensure all stakeholders are not only informed but also actively engaged and committed to the strategy’s success. This strategy will encompass several key channels, each tailored to its specific audience and objectives.

For Internal Communication, regular town hall meetings will be conducted by senior leadership to articulate the strategic vision, provide updates on progress, and foster a sense of shared purpose. These will be complemented by internal newsletters and a dedicated intranet portal, serving as central repositories for information, celebrating successes, and providing accessible platforms for employees to offer feedback and raise concerns. The aim is to clearly articulate the strategic vision and each individual’s role in achieving it, thereby building a cohesive and motivated workforce.

External Communication will focus on strategically positioning InnovateTech’s enhanced value proposition, showcasing product innovations, and highlighting the strength of its strategic partnerships to customers, investors, and the broader market. This will involve a proactive public relations approach, including targeted press releases, dynamic social media engagement across professional platforms, participation in key industry conferences, and the development of thought leadership content (e.g., whitepapers, webinars) that demonstrates InnovateTech’s expertise and vision.

Finally, Stakeholder Engagement will involve regular, structured interactions with key partners, investors, and industry influencers. These engagements will be designed to ensure their continued support, align their interests with InnovateTech’s strategic direction, and leverage their insights for continuous improvement. This multi-faceted approach ensures that communication is not merely a one-way broadcast but a dynamic, interactive process that builds trust and fosters collaboration.

Monitoring and Evaluation Framework:

Monitoring and evaluation will be continuous, utilising a balanced scorecard approach to track both financial and non-financial performance indicators, thereby providing a holistic view of strategic progress. Key metrics will include:

Financial indicators such as revenue growth from AI analytics software, closely tracking the direct impact of the strategy on the top line. Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) and Customer Lifetime Value (CLTV) will be rigorously monitored to ensure profitable growth and long-term customer relationships. Furthermore, R&D expenditure as a percentage of revenue will be tracked to ensure sustained investment in innovation.

From a Customer perspective, market share percentage will be a direct measure of achieving the core business objective. Customer Satisfaction Scores (CSAT) and Net Promoter Score (NPS) will provide crucial insights into customer sentiment and loyalty, while product feature adoption rates will indicate the success of product innovation efforts.

For Internal Process efficiency, metrics such as R&D cycle times, sales conversion rates, and customer support resolution times will be tracked to ensure operational excellence and responsiveness.

Finally, Learning and Growth will be assessed through employee training completion rates, reflecting investment in human capital. Innovation metrics, such as the number of new features launched and their market impact, will gauge the organisation’s capacity for continuous improvement, and employee engagement scores will provide insights into the internal culture and its alignment with strategic goals.

These metrics will be tracked through a centralised dashboard, reviewed quarterly by the Strategy Implementation Committee, and reported annually to the board. Variances from targets will trigger root cause analysis and corrective actions. A formal post-implementation review will be conducted after three years to assess the overall success of the strategy against the initial business objective and to inform future strategic planning. This rigorous monitoring framework ensures accountability, facilitates timely adjustments, and drives continuous improvement, ultimately maximising the likelihood of achieving the desired market share increase.

Reflective Account:

Throughout the process of developing this organisational strategy for InnovateTech Solutions, several key insights have emerged regarding the complexities of strategic leadership and the practical application of theoretical frameworks. Initially, the sheer volume of internal and external factors influencing strategy development, as critiqued in Section 1.1, underscored the necessity for a holistic and systemic approach.

The PESTLE and Porter’s Five Forces frameworks, while foundational, revealed their true value not as static analytical tools but as dynamic lenses through which to continuously scan and interpret the environment. My understanding of strategic drivers has deepened, moving beyond a superficial recognition of their existence to an appreciation of their intricate interdependencies and potential for synergistic or conflicting impacts. This reinforced the idea that strategy is not a singular event but an ongoing process of sense-making and adaptation.

The critical appraisal of various strategic development approaches in Section 1.2 highlighted the tension between deliberate planning and emergent adaptation. While my initial inclination might have been towards a more deliberate, top-down approach for clarity and control, the analysis of emergent strategies and the Resource-Based View (RBV) demonstrated the vital role of flexibility and leveraging unique internal capabilities.

The hybrid implementation model recommended for InnovateTech Solutions, combining top-down strategic direction with agile execution, directly reflects this learning. It acknowledges that while a clear vision is essential, the pathways to achieving it must remain adaptable to unforeseen market shifts and technological advancements. This shift in perspective is crucial for navigating the VUCA environment, where rigid adherence to a pre-defined plan can be detrimental.

The discussion on the challenges of developing and leading strategic change in Section 1.3 provided a realistic grounding for the entire exercise. The complexities of cultural resistance, stakeholder management, and resource allocation are not abstract concepts but tangible hurdles that require sophisticated leadership.

The emphasis on leaders as ‘cultural architects’ and the need for ‘psychological safety’ resonated strongly, highlighting that successful strategy implementation is as much about people and culture as it is about processes and technology. This reinforced the understanding that effective strategic leadership demands not only analytical prowess but also high emotional intelligence and a deep commitment to ethical considerations. The ethical and governance dimensions, in particular, underscored the profound responsibility of strategic leaders to balance commercial objectives with broader societal impacts.

Developing the organisational strategy for InnovateTech Solutions in Section 2.1 was a practical exercise in translating theoretical understanding into actionable plans. The process of formulating SMART objectives, defining strategic pillars, and identifying key success factors forced a rigorous discipline in strategic thinking. The choice of market penetration, product development, and strategic partnerships as core approaches was a direct application of the Ansoff Matrix, tailored to the specific objective of increasing market share in the AI-powered analytics sector. This demonstrated how theoretical models provide a robust framework for structuring strategic choices, even within a hypothetical scenario.

Finally, recommending an implementation and monitoring approach in Section 2.2 brought the entire strategic cycle into focus. The integration of a hybrid implementation model, robust governance, a multi-directional communication strategy, and a balanced scorecard approach for monitoring, collectively illustrated the comprehensive nature of strategic execution.

The emphasis on transformational leadership and continuous learning through agile methodologies reflected a contemporary understanding of effective change management. This reflective process has not only deepened my theoretical knowledge of strategic leadership but has also provided a practical blueprint for approaching future strategic challenges with greater confidence and a more nuanced, adaptive mindset.

Conclusion

CMI 704 Assignment Example has provided a comprehensive exploration of strategic leadership and organisational strategy development, critically examining the driving factors, diverse approaches, and inherent challenges. Through the lens of InnovateTech Solutions, a practical strategy was formulated and an implementation approach recommended, demonstrating the synthesis of theoretical knowledge with practical application.

The analysis underscores that effective strategic leadership in today’s complex environment demands a multifaceted skill set, encompassing analytical rigour, cultural sensitivity, ethical discernment, and adaptive foresight. Leaders must be adept at navigating the interplay of internal capabilities and external pressures, embracing hybrid approaches that balance deliberate planning with emergent adaptation. Ultimately, successful strategy is not merely about crafting a perfect plan but about fostering an organisational culture that is resilient, agile, and continuously learning, capable of translating strategic intent into sustained organisational success and societal value.

References

Ansoff, H.I. (1957) ‘Strategies for Diversification’, Harvard Business Review, 35(5), pp. 113-124.

Barney, J.B. and Hesterly, W.S. (2019) Strategic Management and Competitive Advantage: Concepts and Cases. 7th edn. Harlow: Pearson Education.

Bass, B.M. and Riggio, R.E. (2006) Transformational Leadership. 2nd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

CMI (Chartered Management Institute) (2024) CMI Level 7 Strategic Management and Leadership Practice: Unit 704 Syllabus. London: CMI.

Edmondson, A.C. (1999) ‘Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), pp. 350-383.

GOV.UK (2022) Data Saves Lives: Reshaping Health and Social Care with Data. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/data-saves-lives-reshaping-health-and-social-care-with-data (Accessed: 12 June 2026).

Johnson, G., Scholes, K. and Whittington, R. (2008) Exploring Corporate Strategy: Text & Cases. 8th edn. Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.

Kaufmann, S.A., Macready, W.G. and Logan, D. (2000) ‘Re-thinking the Origins of Life: The Role of Autocatalytic Sets’, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 203(1), pp. 11-30.

Mintzberg, H. (1994) The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. New York: Free Press.

Osterwalder, A. and Pigneur, Y. (2010) Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Porter, M.E. (2008) Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press.

Raoofian, A. (2025) ‘Digging into the drivers of strategic renewal: a systematic literature review’, International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 33(12), pp. 1267-1280.

Schein, E.H. (1993) ‘On Dialogue, Culture, and Organizational Learning’, Organizational Dynamics, 22(2), pp. 40-51.

Schwartz, P. (1991) The Art of the Long View: Planning for the Future in an Uncertain World. New York: Doubleday.

Singh, R. (2016) ‘McKinsey 7S Framework: A Tool for Organisational Change’, International Journal of Management and Social Sciences Research, 5(2), pp. 1-6.